tugas teori johari window

Diposting oleh Fitto

Name : Fitri Maedasari
NIM : A 300 080 136
Class : D

TEORI JOHARI WINDOW


  1. Miss A termasuk games man karena dia banyak mengumpulkan feed back untuk dimainkan. Dia sedikit ngomong dan banyak mendengarkan. Penetahuan umumnya cukup luas. (Private Area)
  2. Miss N termasuk orang yang exhibitionist karena setiap saat jika punya sesuatu yang baru pasti dipamerkan. Cenderung banyak bicara tanpa ada jeda. (Blind Area lebih menonjol pada dirinya)
  3. Mr. A termasuk orang yang penyendiri, dia sedikit bicara dan bergaul sehingga sedikit informasi yang didapatnya teman- temannya mengatakan kalau dia adalah orang yang kuper. (Hidden Area lebih dominan pada dirinya)
  4. Miss S termasuk kategori orang yang open-minded karena memberi informasi sesuai dengan situasi dan kondisi. Ketika bicara dia selalu melihat siapa yang mengajaknya bicara sehingga dia bisa memberi dan mengeluarkan informasi sesuai dengan kebutuhan (Sifat dominan pada dirinya yaitu Public Area)

Category: 0 komentar

Analysis the Zoo Story by Edward Albee

Diposting oleh Fitto


NAME         : FITRI MAEDASARI
NIM             : A 3200 80 136

Analysis the Zoo Story by Edward Albee

A. Character and characterization
1. Peter:
Peter is a middle-class publishing executive with a wife, two daughters, two cats and two parakeets who lives in ignorance of the world outside his settled life.
2. Jerry:
Jerry is an isolated and disheartened man who lives in a boarding house and is very troubled.

B. Setting:
1. Place: New York's Central Park Zoo.
2. Time: on a sunny afternoon.

C. Plot:
While Peter is reading a book on a bench in Central Park, he is interrupted by Jerry, a total stranger, who announces that he has just been to the zoo. Anxious to return to his reading, Peter reacts with merely vague interest and lights his pipe, but he is immediately made uncomfortable by Jerry’s queries about his marital status, children, work, and menage of cats and parakeets. After repeating that he has been to the zoo and that Peter will read about it in the papers the next day if he does not see it on television that very night, Jerry follows several digressions about sociological class distinctions, literary tastes, and his daylong wanderings. He also gives a detailed description of his rooming house and its characters on the Upper West Side. Peter is embarrassed to hear these sordid details. Jerry says that, unlike Peter, he owns little except for toilet articles, pornographic playing cards, eight or nine books, cutlery, empty picture frames, an old Western Union typewriter that prints nothing but capital letters, and a small box containing letters and some sea-rounded rocks that he picked up on a beach when he was a boy.
Then he tells of his mother’s desertion of his father and him, as well as her promiscuity, alcoholism, and death at Christmas. He continues with his father’s accidental death and the demise, on Jerry’s high school graduation day, of his guardian, a dour aunt. Jerry confides that his relationships with women are limited to solitary encounters with prostitutes and that his only love affair was a brief one, at age fifteen, with a Greek boy. Then he launches into a long monologue about his disgusting, lusty, alcoholic landlady and her ugly, savage black dog that attacked Jerry daily whenever he tried to enter the rooming house, although he attempted to pacify it by feeding it hamburger for six days. On the seventh day, he poisoned the meat, and the dog fell extremely ill. Strangely, Jerry no longer wanted the dog to die; he had come to believe that if he could somehow make contact with the dog, he could then make contact with people. The moment of contact passed, however, and was lost. From then on, Jerry and the dog lapsed into mutual indifference. Jerry claims to have learned from this misadventure that kindness and cruelty, like other conflicting emotions, are the reality of being. This story has a hypnotic effect on Peter, who makes no comment during its lengthy recitation. Grotesquely exhausted at the end of the story, Jerry sits down on the bench beside Peter and sees that he has annoyed and confused Peter instead of making a breakthrough in communication. Suddenly playful, he tickles Peter’s ribs, driving Peter into almost hysterical laughter. He pokes Peter, then punches him in the arm and forces him to move down the bench. Easily goaded by Jerry’s insults to his manhood, Peter decides to fight for the bench, but when Jerry clicks open a knife and tosses it at him, Peter refuses to pick it up. Jerry rushes over, grabs him by the collar, slaps him, spits on his face, and forces Peter to dart for the knife. Then, sighing heavily, Jerry charges Peter and impales himself on the knife. As Jerry crumbles back onto the bench, with his eyes and mouth wide in agony, his voice acquires an eerie remoteness. Peter is transfixed as Jerry, with faint laughter, tries to summarize in broken, disjointed sentences his knowledge of his own actions. The world, he has found, is a zoo, and he thanks Peter for ending his anguished life. Slowly wiping clean the knife handle with his own handkerchief, Jerry urges Peter to hurry away. As Peter retreats with a pitiable howl, Jerry ends the play with a combination of scornful mockery and a desperate supplication to the God who failed to give him a cure for his desperate alienation.

D. Point of View:
The point of view is the third person. Narrator is not involved in this drama. The narrator is just telling the story.

E. Themes:
The plot tell about the different classes between two peoples, From the characters, the play shows that someone who lives with a wife, children’s, pets, love and also money than the other lives with the complicated apartment without anything they have to put in their wall. The setting told that is the place pleasant, without noise, very quiet than no body can hear the voice if you scream. Base on these elements, the theme of the play can be stated as fight for the best state of the bench.

F. Conclusion:
The conclusion of this drama is relationship between human and society

Category: 0 komentar

THE PROPOSAL by Anton Chekhov

Diposting oleh Fitto


NAME         : FITRI MAEDASARI
NIM             : A 3200 80 136

THE PROPOSAL by Anton Chekhov

  1. Character and Characterization:
  1. Stepan: Chubukov is a landowner. His physical looks like 60 years old. He is a kind-man and polite, for instance to his neighbor. He is relax and senile.
  2. Natalya: Natalya is a Chubukov’s daughter. She is 25 years old. Natalya is a fussy girl. She wants to get everything what she wants. She is in love, egad, she is like a love-sick cat.
  3. Ivan: Ivan is a neighbor of Chubukov. He is 35 years old, a critical age. Ivan is a large and hearty. If he gets nervous, his heart’s palpitating awfully, especially when face with Natalya. He does not have a brave in front of woman.

  1. Setting:
  1. Place: It is happened in Chubunkov’s country-house, exactly a t drawing room.
  2. Time: It is happened in evening, about 7 p.m.

  1. Plot Summary:
In the evening, Lomov comes to Chubunkov’s house. He wears evening dress, gloves, hat, and so on. Chubunkov is surprised but feels so glad when meet him. Lomov says that he wants to propose Natalya, Chubunkov’s daughter. Chubunkov is very happy when hears that and directly accepts the proposal. Lomov feels he is not proper man to Natalya. It is the right time for Lomov to ask Natalya in marriage.
Chubunkov shouts to call Natlya. Natalya enters to drawing room. She seems happy and shy. First they are talking about the wheather. Then when Lomov discusses Oxen meadows is his mine, Natalya becomes dies angry and says disagreement. She quarrels with Lomov to get land right. Natalya humiliates Lomov, she thinks that he is a good neighbor but Lomov is just a Land-grabber, Lomov cannot control has emotional sense and shout to Natalya. Natalya complais to her father and ask to him to state that Meadows is Chubukov’s mine. Lomov accuses Chubukov has taken the Meadows from Lomov’s family. He thinks that the Lomov’s is honourable people.  
The situation becomes more critical, Lomov and Chubukov humiliate their family each other. Lomov’s heart cannot stop palpitate. Then he decides to leave that house. After Lomovs leaving them, Chubukov forget to say that actually Lemov’s co,oing is to propose Natalya. He wants to make a proposal. Natalya is shocked when hear that. She wants Lomov comeback soon. Natalya shall acknowledge that Oxen Meadows is Lomov’s mine. She also asks forgiving abaout debating before. Chubukov is greatly asthonished with the alteration of his daughter opinion.
Natalya and Lomov talk of something else. They talk about their dogs. But they repeat their fight anymore. Lomov argues that Guess is the best dog. He is a first-rate dog. But Natalya disagree it, the squeezer is better than Guess. They do it again, humiliate to each other. Chubukov joins the dispute. They compare their dogs and tell the ugliness.
Suddenly, Lomov feels numb and collapse. Natalya shouts to her papa, Lomov has died. Chubukov is frightened and take a drink to make Lomov awake. Unexpectedly, Lomov becomes aware, and Chubukov ask to them marry as quickly. Natalya is willing to marry with Lomov. They kiss each other,, and Natalya said that Lomov wants to admit Guess is worse that squeezer. Lomov disagree it, and argues that Guess is the best.

  1. Theme:
The farce explores the process of getting married and could be read as a satire on the upper middle class and courtship. The play points out the struggle to balance the economic necessities of marriage and what the characters themselves actually want. It shows the characters' desperation for marriage as comical. In Chekhov's Russia, marriage was a mean of economic stability for most people. They married to gain wealth and possessions or to satisfy social pressure. The satire is conveyed successfully by emphasizing the couple's foolish arguments over small things. The main arguments in the play revolve around The Oxen Meadows and two dogs called Ugadi and Otkatai

  1. Conclusion:
The conclusion is content the man and the society. In this story, the man faced by the society in around. The story is so funny with the actor and actress which so funny. This drama can entertainment us and the story so easy to understand. There are any three actors in this story: Stepan, Natalya and Ivan. We can take the positive point of this story, there are the differences of us can not be something that make someone be enemy. Finally the differences of us will be something that good and nice in the end. So we must accept the differences between us and then respect each other.

Category: 2 komentar

DEATH of a SALESMAN by Arthur Miller

Diposting oleh Fitto


NAME       : FITRI MAEDASARI
NIM            : A320080136

DEATH of a SALESMAN by Arthur Miller

A.      The Characters
1.      Main Characters
a.       Willy Loman - A 63 year old once popular salesman who’s lost his popularity and sales, not to mention his mind.
b.      Biff Loman - A 34 year old son of Willy who has been searching for himself while working on farms in the west to the dismay of his father.
c.       Happy Loman - The younger brother of Biff who tries in all he can to please his father and attempts to continue his father’s dream after he dies.
d.      Linda Loman - The wife of Willy who tries to protect Willy’s feelings and can’t make herself confront him if it means hurting his feelings.
2.      Minor Characters
a.       Bernard - A bookish friend of Biff and Happy who urges Biff to study in high school to no avail, however, he himself makes it as a prominent lawyer and goes to argue a case to the Supreme Court at the end of the play.
b.      Charley - Bernard’s father who is fairly successful and offers Willy a job which Willy refuses on the basis of pride.

B.       Plot
Willy Loman returns home after an unsuccessful business trip. Frustrated at his lack of success, his wife Linda suggests that he ask his boss Howard Wagner to allow him to work in his home city so he will not have to travel. Willy complains to Linda that their son, Biff, who comes home for the holidays, has yet to make good on his life. Despite Biff's promise as an athlete in high school, he flunked senior year math, made no effort in summer school, and never went to college.
Biff and his brother, happy, who is also visiting, reminisce about their childhood together. They discuss their father's mental degeneration, which they have witnessed by his constant vacillations and talking to him. When Willy walks in, angry that the two boys have never amounted to anything, biff and happy tell Willy that biff plans to make a business proposition the next day in an effort to pacify their father.
The next day Willy goes to ask his boss for a job in town while biff goes to make a business proposition. Both fail, as Willy gets angry and ends up getting fired when the boss tells him to continue being a traveling salesman, while biff makes a terrible impression during his business presentation and impulsively steals a fountain pen (an expensive symbol of status worth far more than a ball point pen). Willy then meets Bernard, who tells him that biff originally wanted to do well in summer school, but something happened in Boston when biff went to visit Willy there that changed his mind.
Happy, biff, and Willy meet for dinner at a restaurant, but Willy refuses to hear bad news from biff. The two sons decide to lie to their father, who then goes into a flashback of what happened in Boston the day biff stopped trying to succeed in life. Willy had been in a hotel on a sales trip with a young woman when biff showed up, causing him to want to flunk math and ruin his father's dreams of his success out of spite.
Biff and Happy leave their deranged father in the restaurant for a couple of young women, yet when they return home they find their mother knew they left Willy alone. She angrily shouts at them while Willy remains talking to himself outside. Eventually Willy joins the argument, at which point biff forcefully says that he is no longer being a failure out of spite: he simply knows he isn't cut out to be a successful business man. The feud culminates with Biff hugging Willy, telling his father he loves him.
Rather than listen to what biff actually says, Willy realizes his son has forgiven him and thinks biff will now pursue a career as a businessman. Willy decides to kill himself in an auto accident so that biff can get enough money to start his business, yet at the funeral biff retains his belief that he does not want to become a businessman. Happy, on the other hand, chooses to take the insurance money and follow in his father's footsteps.

C.       Setting
The action takes place at Willy Loman’s house in the New York City area, as well as other New York locales, and in a hotel room in Boston. Some of the action takes place in flashbacks while Willy hallucinates.

D.      Style
The style and devices miller uses enhances Willy’s mental state.  By using flashback and reveries, he allows the audience to get into the mind of Willy Loman and brings us into a sense of pity for him. Death of a salesman is a stage play in the form of a tragedy. There is much discussion of whether death of a salesman can be considered a tragedy. ‘Tragedy’ as a form was defined by the Greek playwright Aristotle in 330 BC. He defined a tragic character. Language, the use of language in death of a salesman is entirely realistic. Miller’s dialogue is carefully constructed to follow the exact speech patterns of ordinary New Yorkers. It is very dense and fast, with repetitions, hesitations, and contradictions. The characters often use slang and clichés.

E.       Theme
Willy is deteriorating and suicidal, biff is told to get serious. Here comes the conflict, right on schedule. Willy’s mental wanderings are getting worse; he is preoccupied with Biff’s aimlessness and inability to find success in business. Linda informs her sons that Willy has been trying to commit suicide and tells biff that his father’s life is in his hands. Biff needs to get a job and get serious or take the blame for his father’s actions.

F.        Conclusion
This story is classified as “man vs. Society”, because the conflict arises because of Willy cannot be proper father for his family and as a man in his society he is failed.

Category: 1 komentar

The Lesson (Tugas Drama)

Diposting oleh Fitto


Fitri Maedasari
A320080136
THE LESSON
A Comic Drama


1.      Characterization
a.       The professor, age 50 to 60, male.
      Genius person, selfish, emotional, has psychology problem.
b.      The young pupil, age 18, female.
Obedience, excellent, has self confidence, hardworking student, has high passion.
c.       The maid, age 45 to 60, female.
Fearless, cautiously, has high concentration, and smart.
2.      Setting of place and time
a.       Place
 In the office of the professor and in the dining room of  professor’s apartment.
b.      Time
In the morning when the summer season.
3.      Plot
a.       Exposition
Introduction each character, the circumstances and the problem. Then the pupil come and explains the purpose to professor as the part of exposition.
b.      Complication
The complication appears when the professor can’t control his emotion because of pressure.
c.       Climax
The climax occur when the professor out of control and kill his student.
d.      Resolution
Resolution is end of the conflict. At first the maid was given the notice to the professor but the professor refuses her. Then when the pupil was killing, the maid and the professor hide the pupil’s body until end of the drama.
4.      Theme
The theme of this drama is thinking hard in dangerous situation to found the ways to break it up.
5.      Style
Drama tragedy.
6.      Summary
The form is man and society. It can shown that the professor is an intelligent man, but because he out of the control, he do the criminal act. He depressed and stressed that becomes a psychopath. He kills the pupil for his satisfaction. The maid also assisted to hide the pupil’s body.

Category: 0 komentar
Langganan: Postingan (Atom)